在党的二十大报告中，强调了实现人与自然和谐共生是中国现代化进程中的关键目标。环保行业对于提升我国生态环境品质具有不可替代的作用。本文通过深入研究相关文献，选取环保民营企业一博天环境公司作为案例分析对象。首先阐述了研究背景及研究意义:由于宏观经济增速的减缓以及PPP(Public-Private Partnership，公私合作伙伴关系)监管的加强，越来越多的民营环保企业开始积极探索与国有资本合作的路径，以期借助国有资本的资源和平台解决资金不足和融资难题。近年来，众多民营企业通过逆向混合所有制改革来寻求生存和发展的新机遇，特别是在环保行业，这一现象尤为显著。混合所有制改革不仅包括国有企业引入民营资本的“正向混改”，也包括民营企业引入国有资本的“逆向混改”。从理论的角度来看，本研究旨在丰富关于环保民营企业混合所有制改革的学术讨论，并为推动国民经济的稳定发展提供理论支持，为涉足混合所有制改革的环保民营企业的研究领域提供了更广阔的视角。从现实意义来看，面对当前复杂且多变的经济形势，民营企业通过引入国有资本的策略，不仅能有效纾解资金层面的紧张状况，还能借助国有资本所带来的资源优势及政策扶持，显著强化其市场竞争地位。经由这一变革过程，民营企业将更能顺应市场动态变化，达成可持续发展的目标，进而为我国经济的高质量发展进程作出积极贡献。

    通过深入研究逆向混合所有制改革、民营企业“逆向混改”动因以及经济效果的相关文献，并对混合所有制、逆向混合所有制和环保企业概念进行了界定。同时，对政治关联理论、协同效应理论和资源依赖理论进行了阐述。对混改的案例公司进行介绍，进一步阐述逆向混改的历程，并从外部和内部两个角度分析了逆向混改的动因。接着对博天环境公司的经济效果进行研究，分析盈利能力、偿债能力、营运能力和成长能力这四大财务指标，以及EVA(Economic Value Added)指标、Z-score模型，对博天环境逆向混改的经济效果进行了评估。并对博天环境公司的治理能力、组织效能和业务模式深入分析。得出环保民营企业博天环境的逆向混改策略不仅得到了市场的正面响应，还提升了企业的财务表现的结论，例如偿债能力、治理能力得到了提升。

   本文通过深入分析博天环境公司逆向混改的具体案例，提炼出了相关结论。以期通过推进混合所有制改革，助力民营企业摆脱发展困境，增强其持续发展的潜力。面对当前复杂且多变的经济形势，民营企业通过引入国有资本的策略，不仅能有效纾解资金层面的紧张状况，还能借助国有资本所带来的资源优势及政策扶持，显著强化其市场竞争地位。同时，逆向混合所有制改革有助于民营企业调整和优化股权架构，完善公司治理结构，从而提升整体运营效能。经由这一变革过程，民营企业将更能顺应市场动态变化，达成可持续发展的目标，进而为我国经济的高质量发展进程作出积极贡献。

关键词:逆向混改:博天环境:经济效果:环保行业

   In the report of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, was emphasized that achieving hammonious coexistence between humans and nature is a key goal in China's modernization process. The environmental protection industry plays an irreplaceable role improving the quality of China's ecological environment. This article selects the private environmental protection enterprise, Botian Environmental Company, as the object of case analysis through in-depth research relevant literature. Firstly, the research background and significance are expounded: Due to the slowdown of macroeconomic growth and the strengthening of PPP(Public-Private Partnership), more and more private environmental protection enterprises have begun to actively explore paths to cooperate with statc-owned capital, in order to solve the problems of insufficient funds and financing difficulties using the resources and platforms of state-owned capital. In recent years, many private enterprises have sought new opportunities for survival and development through reverse mixed ownership reform, especially in environmental protection industry, where this phenomenon is particularly significant. Mixed ownership reform includes not only the "forward mixed reform" of state-owned enterprises introducing private capital, but the "reverse mixed reform" of private enterprises introducing state-owned capital. From a theoretical perspective, this study aims to enrich the academic discussion on the mixed ownership reform of environmental protection enterprises, and to provide theoretical support for promoting the stable development of the national economy, and to provide a broader perspective for the research field of private environmental protection involved in mixed ownership reform. From a practical perspective, facing the current complex and changeable economic situation,private enterprises can not only effectively alleviate the tension in the capital by introducing state-owned capital, but also significantly strengthen their market competitive position by using the resource advantages and policy support brought by state-owned capital. Through this transformation process private enterprises will be able to better adapt to market dynamics, achieve the goal of sustainable development, and thus make positive contributions to the high-quality development process of China's.
      By deeply studying the relevant literature on reverse mixed ownership reform, the motivation and economic effect of private enterprises'"reverse mixed reform", and defining the concepts of mixed, reverse mixed ownership and environmental protection enterprises. At the same time, the theory of political connection, the thcory of synergistic effect and the theory of resource dependence. The case company of mixed reform is introduced, and the process of reverse mixed reform is further expounded, and the motivation of reverse mixed reform is analyzed from external and internal perspectives. Then the economic effect of Botian Environmental Company is studied, and the four major financial indicators of profitability, solvency, operational capacity and capacity, as well as the EVA(Economic Value Added) index and the Z-score model, are analyzed to evaluate the economic effect of Botian Environmental mixed reform. And the govemance capacity, organizational effectiveness and business model of Botian Environmental Company are deeply analyzed.
      It is concluded that the reverse mixed reform strategy of the environmental protection enterprise Botian Environmental has not only received a positive response from the market, but has also improved the financial performance of the enterprise, such as solve and governance capacity. This article refines the relevant conclusions by deeply analyzing the specific case of Botian Environmental reverse mixed reform. It is expected that by promoting the ownership reform, it will help private enterprises get rid of the dilemma of development and enhance their potential for sustainable development. Facing the current complex and changeable economic situation, enterprises can not only effectively alleviate the tension in the capital level by introducing state-owned capital, but also significantly strengthen their market competitive position by using the resource advantages and policy brought by state-owned capital.
Keywords: Reverse Mixed Reform: Botian Environment: Economic Effects: Environmental
Protection Industry

[01] 贺京同，高林.企业所有权、创新激励政策及其效果研究[J].财经研究,2012,38(03):15-25.

[02] 廖红伟,李昕.“逆向混改”与民营企业绿色转型[J].学习与探索,2024,(08):143-153.

[03] 宫庆祝.我国民营经济发展的制约问题研究[J].营销界,2020（44）:17-18.

[04] 黄宇清.“逆向混改”与民营企业会计信息披露质量[D]. 中南财经政法大学,2023.

[05] 陈吉,王右文.数字经济下民营企业逆向混合所有制改革分析[J].现代商业,2024,(11):76-79.

[06] 张红梅.上市公司战略投资者引入动机及经济后果分析——以美的集团为例[J].财会通讯,2020(20):173-176.

[07] 王婷,李政.党的十八届三中全会以来国有企业混合所有制改革研究进展与述评[J].政治经济学评论,2020,11(06):116-145.

[08] 余玥.碧水源逆向混改的动因及效果研究[D].南京审计大学,2022.

[09] 竺李乐,吴福象,李雪. 民营企业创新能力:特征事实与作用机制一一基于民营企业引入国有资 本的“逆向混改”视角[J].财经科学,2021(01):76-90.

[10] 董影,董欣然.康恩贝逆向混改动因及财务绩效分析[J]. 中小企业管理与科技,2024,(11):185-1 87.

[11] 王玮,梁诗,何红玲,王春莉. 国企混改与双元创新——基于股权多样性视角[J].华东经济管理, 2021,35(09):11-20.

[12] 宋增基，冯莉茗，谭兴民. 国有股权、民营企业家参政与企业融资便利性——自中国民营控 股上市公司的经验证据[J]金融研究，2014 ，（12）: 133-147.

[13] 罗党论，刘晓龙.政治关系、进入壁垒与企业绩效－来自中国民营上市公司的经验证据[J] 管理世界 2009(05):97-106.

[14] Baer w Montes-Rojas G.From Privatization to Re-nationalization: What went Wrong with Privatizations in Argentina[J].Oxford Development Studies,2008,36(36):323-337.

[15] 吴国鼎. 民营上市企业国有化：动因和成绩[J]辽宁大学学报，2020,8(06):25-36.

[16] 冶琳苗,吴春贤.逆向混改对环保企业绩效的影响机制研究——基于清新环境的案例[J].财会 通讯,2024,(08):95-102.

[17] 庄子萱,冉渝,殷皓洲.“逆向混改”能够促进民营企业承担环境社会责任吗[J].宏观经济研究,2 023,(07):111-127.

[18] Jennifer M, O,Sudeshn G,B.The impact of corporate governance on corporate performance :Evidence from Japan[J].Science Direct,2005(16).

[19] 陈林, 陈焕然.发展混合所有制经济的路径选择——基于“双向混改”模式的讨论[J].学术研究, 2021(05):78-84.

[20] 马向羽. 民营环保企业逆向混改的动因及效果分析——以 T 企业为例[J].上海企业,2024,(04): 31-33.

[21] 王玉.“逆向混改”研究综述与展望[J]. 中小企业管理与科技,2023,(19):37-39.

[22] Fisman R.Estimating the value of political connections[J].American economic review,2001,91(4):1095-1102.

[23] Boubakri N,Cosset J C,Saffar W.The impact of political connections on firms operating and financing decisions[J].Journal of Financial Research,2012,35(3):397-423.

[24] 田苗. 民企逆向混改对企业绩效的影响研究[J].河北企业,2023,(12):78-80.

[25] 刘林.基于信号理论视角下的企业家政治联系与企业市场绩效的关系研究[J]．管理评论,2016,28（03）：93-105.

[26] 石水平.控制权转移、超控制权与大股东利益侵占——来自上市公司高管变更的经验证据[J].金融研究,2010(04):160-176.

[27] 郭爽,刘梅娟. 民营环保企业逆向混改财务绩效研究——以节能国祯为例[J].财务管理研究,2 023,(06):8-13.

[28] 张兆国，曾牧，刘永丽.政治关系、债务融资与企业投资行为——来自我国上市公司的经验 证据[J]. 中国软科学，2011(05):106-121.

[29] 曾萍,邓腾智.政治关联与企业绩效关系的 Meta 分析[J].管理学报，2012,9(11)：1600-1608.

[30] Blau B M,Brough T J,Thomas D W.Corporate Lobbying,Political Connections,and the Bai lout of Banks[J].Journal of Banking&Finance,2013,37(8):3007-3017.

[31] 王欣,韩宝山.混合所有制企业股权结构治理效应分析[J].经济体制改革,2018(06):125-131.

[32] Berle,A and Means,G, 1932,The Modem Corporation and Private Property,Macmillan,New York.

[33] 胡迟.新中国成立 70 周年再论新时代完善国有企业的功能定位[J].经济纵横,2019(06):37-45.

[34] Edwards J.and Weichenrieder.Ownership Concentration and ShareUaluation:Evidence from Germany[R].University of Cambridge and University of Frankfurt.SSRN Working thesis.20 01.

[35] Michael L.Lemmon,Karl V.Lins.Ownership Structure,Corporate Governance,and FirmValue: Evidence from the East Asian Financial Crisis.2003,58(4):1445-1468.

[36] Massimo Massa and Pedro Matos,Shareholder investment horizons and the market forcorp orate control[J].Journal of Financial Economic,2005,15(76):135-165.

[37] 许小年,王燕. 中国上市公司的所有制结构与公司治理[J].经济研究, 1998,7:105-127.

[38] 张红君.股权结构与上市公司财务绩效的关系研究[J].全国流通经济,2020（20）:144-145.

[39] 温磊,张懿文,张瑞琛.“逆向混改”：国有股东参股能否促进企业内部共同富裕[J].现代管理科 学,2023,(02):66-76.

[40] 李小芳. 国企混合所有制改革对企业绩效的影响——以古井酒店为例[J].广西民族师范学院 学报,2020,37（05）:83-86.

[41] 任广乾,赵梦洁,刘莉等. 国资参股、关系网络与民企创新效率[J].工程管理科技前沿,2022,41(02):84-90.

[42] 刘天雨. 国有战略投资者影响民营企业内部控制的机制研究——基于扎根理论[J].财务管理 研究,2024,(02):81-86.

[43] 邓永勤,汪静. 国有参股股东能够促进企业创新吗[J]．科技进步与对策，2020,37(10):81-89.

[44] 罗宏，秦际栋. 国有股权参股对家族企业创新投入的影响[J]．中国工业经济，2019(07):174-192.

[45] 胡宁,靳庆鲁. 社会性负担与公司财务困境动态——基于 ST制度的考察[J].会计研究，2018(11): 28-35.